Founders ask us for investor outreach benchmarks all the time. What reply rate is good? How many replies turn into meetings? Is LinkedIn better than email? You can find confident answers to all of these online. Most of them don’t name a study, a sample or even a definition of “reply.”
At Investor Links, we run investor outreach on email and LinkedIn every week, so we care about getting these numbers right. This report only uses figures from named public sources. Where no reliable data exists, we say so.
Why are most investor reply rate numbers hard to trust?
Because “reply rate” means different things in different places. Some count replies per email sent, some per email delivered, some per person contacted across a whole sequence. Some count every reply, including “not interested.” Others count only positive ones.
Two numbers can look far apart and measure almost the same thing, or look the same and measure different things. Before you compare yourself to any benchmark, check three things: what counts as a reply, what the denominator is, and who was emailed.
What are the real investor outreach benchmarks for cold email?
The largest controlled study we found is a field experiment by Gornall and Strebulaev. Between October 30 and November 16, 2018, the researchers sent 80,000 pitch emails to 28,000 VCs and angels on behalf of fictitious startups. Here’s what they found:
- 6.5% of emails got a reply.
- 4.3% got an interested reply.
- The best 10% of pitches got an interested reply rate of 14% overall, and 18% from VCs.
- 72% of replies came within one day.
Keep the limits in mind. This study was from 2018, by email only, with made-up startups. The authors also believe spam filters lowered the rates. They suggested a real startup with a strong pitch “might get a 10% or higher rate of interested replies,” but that’s their estimate, not something they measured.
What does a reply from an investor actually mean?
Usually not a meeting. In the same Gornall and Strebulaev study, interested replies broke down like this: 61% asked for the pitch deck, 19% made a referral, 16% asked for a meeting and 14% asked other questions. (A reply could do more than one thing, so these add up to more than 100%.)
So when you track your numbers, split replies into types. A deck request is a good sign, but your deck then has to earn the meeting.
How many investor replies turn into meetings?
There’s no clean public benchmark for this by channel. The closest data point is from DocSend’s 2023 pre-seed report: across over 200 pre-seed startups, founders contacted an average of 71 investors and secured 46 meetings.
That figure mixes every channel, including warm intros, and covers only pre-seed founders using DocSend. It’s not a cold email meeting rate, and you shouldn’t expect a similar ratio from cold outreach alone.
Raising right now?We build the investor list, run the LinkedIn and email outreach, and book the calls. You take the meetings.
Book a CallDo warm introductions get more meetings?
They matter a lot to how VCs find deals, but nobody has published a reliable reply or meeting rate for them. In a 2016 survey of 885 venture capitalists by Gompers and colleagues, over 30% of deals came from the VCs’ professional networks, 20% were referred by other investors, 8% came from portfolio companies and only 10% came inbound from company founders.
That’s a share of closed deals, not a response rate. It tells you warm paths are how most VC deals start. It doesn’t tell you what percentage of warm intros get a meeting. We haven’t seen a public study that measures that.
What about LinkedIn reply rates for investor outreach?
We didn’t find any reliable public data on LinkedIn connection acceptance or reply rates for investor outreach specifically. Published LinkedIn benchmarks we’ve seen come from sales outreach tools and cover selling to buyers, not founders reaching investors. We don’t think those numbers carry over, so we’re not quoting them here.
LinkedIn still has a job in our outreach. A founder’s profile is often where an investor checks you out, and a connection plus a short message gives a second route to someone who missed your email. For how we run it, see our LinkedIn investor outreach approach. Just don’t plan your raise around a LinkedIn reply rate someone made up.
How do sales cold email benchmarks compare?
General B2B sales email has more data, but it’s a different audience. Instantly’s Cold Email Benchmark Report 2026, based on its platform’s data from January 1 to December 18, 2025, reports:
- An average reply rate of 3.43%, counting all replies divided by emails sent.
- 5.5% or more for the top quarter of senders, and 10.7% or more for the top 10%.
- 58% of replies coming from the first email, and 42% from follow-ups.
This is sales outreach, not investor outreach. We include it because it’s large and clearly defined, and because the follow-up split is useful. Don’t present it as an investor reply rate.
What actually moves your investor outreach numbers?
From the data above and our own campaigns, these are the levers that matter: If you are deciding how to run outreach, compare self-serve tools vs done-for-you outreach.
- Matching. In the Gornall and Strebulaev study, many rejections came from a mismatch on geography or industry. A matched list beats a big list.
- The pitch itself. The gap between average pitches and the best 10% in the same study was large. Your one-line story, proof and team line matter.
- Follow-ups. In Instantly’s sales data, follow-ups produced 42% of replies. Investors are busy too.
- Clean lists and deliverability. Instantly advises keeping bounce rates under 2%, and Google’s sender guidelines say to keep spam rates reported in Postmaster Tools below 0.3%. If your emails land in spam, no benchmark applies.
- Short emails. Get to the point fast: what you do, your proof, your round and why this investor.
- Being ready. Most interested replies ask for the deck, so have it ready to send the same day. For what investors weigh once they’re looking, see what investors look for.
How does Investor Links help with investor outreach?
We build a checked list of investors who match your round, write outreach for each investor’s focus, and run it on LinkedIn and email through HeyReach and Instantly. Warm replies go straight to you, and you get weekly numbers on opens, responses and meetings, so you’re judged against your own results, not a made-up benchmark. We don’t promise funding. Book a free call to talk about your round.
Frequently asked questions
What is a good cold email reply rate for investors?
The only large controlled study we found, by Gornall and Strebulaev, saw a 6.5% reply rate and a 4.3% interested reply rate, with the best 10% of pitches reaching 14%. It dates from 2018 and used fictitious startups.
Do warm introductions get more investor meetings?
Warm paths are how most VC deals start. In the Gompers survey, only 10% of deals came inbound from founders. But no reliable public study measures a warm intro meeting rate.
What is the reply rate on LinkedIn for investor outreach?
We didn’t find a reliable public figure. The LinkedIn benchmarks we’ve seen come from sales outreach, not founders contacting investors.
How many investor replies turn into meetings?
There’s no public benchmark by channel. In the Gornall and Strebulaev study, 16% of interested replies asked for a meeting, while 61% asked for a deck.
How do I improve my investor outreach response rate?
Contact investors who fit your stage, sector and check size, keep emails short, follow up, keep your list clean and have your deck ready to send.
Want outreach you can measure?Tell us what you’re raising and we’ll show you how we’d run it.
Book a CallMore reports
- How to Get a Warm Introduction to Investors (Even With No Network)
- How to Choose an Investor Outreach Agency: Questions to Ask and Red Flags
- Pre-Seed to Series A: How Many Investors Founders Really Contact
- What Investors Check Before Taking a First Meeting
- Who Funds FinTech Startups in 2026: VCs, Angels and Family Offices
Raising for a property project? See our investor outreach for real estate developers.